Youth Council 2006
Walker Center - Boston, MA
July 30th through August 5th   

Attendees

Sunday

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

(note: there are no business notes from Thursday)

Friday


Present:

Zarinah Ali (PoCC)
Nick Allen (YCR - PSD)
Casey Asprooth-Jackson (YCR - STL)
Sarah Baxter (YCR - QuOM)
Maggie Boylan (YCR - CMWD)
Becca Brown (YCR - H; SC)

James Brown (Adult At-Large)
Charlie Burke (YCR - MBD)
Sean Capaloff-Jones (PoCC)
Tony Carpenter (SC)
Sara Castro (SC)
Joo Young Choi (YPS)
Lyn Conley (BOT, SC)
Sam Cory (YCR - NE)
Margaret Cummings (YCR - PCD)
Helia Daigeau (PoCC)
Beth Dana (YMA)
Marissa Gutierrez (YMA)
Amelia Harati (PoCC)
Kristen Harper (Adult At-Large)
Jessy Hennesy (YCR - MDD)
Eliza Hens-Greco (YCR - OMD)
Carolina Holt (YCR - NHVT)
Lehna Huie (SC)
Paul Hunt (YCR - Canadian At-Large)
Derek Kravitz (YCR - PSD)
Lizzie Lamb (YCR - PNWD)
Braeden Lentz (TARR - 18-20)
Alice Mandt (SC)
Kat Manker-Seal (SC)
India McKnight (PoCC)
Chris Mitchell (C*SAC)
Elisabeth Moore (TARR - 12-14)
Ian Moore (YRUU Rep to Consultation Task Force)
Nan Moore (SC Adult)
Tsuki Naka (YCR - BCR)
Eric Neal (YCR - SWD)
Kasey Neiss (YCR - MNY)
Paul Phillips (POA)
Rose Roberts (YCR - WCUC)
Mary Roffers (Adult At-Large)
Connie Rowse (YCR - CBD)
Julian Sharp (BOT)
Robert W. Smith (Adult At-Large)
Laura Spencer (Adult At-Large)
Terry Stafford (Adult At-Large)
Elwood Sturtevant (Adult At-Large)
Ethan Taylor (YCR - MSD)
Katrina Thralls (YCR - JPD)
Jova Vargas (YRUU Rep to Consultation Task Force)
Victoria Woodard (YCR - FLD)


Sunday

Covenant
Rules
Orientations

-First Year YCRs
-Second Year YCRs
-Adults
-At-Larges
-Young Adults/Facilitators


Monday

YCR Reports

    Victoria - Florida
  • increasing attendance
  • stayed together
  • Lizzie - Pacific Northwest
  • 2 cons, attendance smaller
  • Youth Advisors pulled
  • Sponsor Con
  • Piloting AR/AO in congregations
  • Youth Empowerment Services (YES) - appointed positions of Youth Ministry Consultants
  • 5 new youth groups
  • trainings for youth ministry consultants
  • Con Con 2008 hosts
  • Eliza - Ohio Meadville
  • 4 cons with 100 attendance
  • huge social justice work - great energy
  • YAC grew
  • strong leadership
  • eliminate YAC clique
  • Connie - Clara Barton
  • YAC focused on relations with adult Board
  • 2 members asked to leave YAC
  • poor communication
  • social justice had problems
  • had a "School Con" on problems with education system
  • issues with cliqueyness
  • no elections (nullified) - NO YAC instead of New YAC - will be re-elected in fall
  • Charlie - Mass Bay
  • 5 cons, small
  • SAC Con 70-80 people
  • Excellent new district youth coordinator (Chris Cayer)
  • Need SDC (missed 3 years)
  • doing a little AR/AO work - need more
  • "Call-Out Committee" deals with sexuality
  • Margaret - Pacific Central
  • SDC and LDC
  • newbie meetings at cons
  • Council (not YAC), need to find adult leaders
  • age range 12-22 may change but need to get UUYAN programming up

  • Carolina - New Hampshire/Vermont
  • better communication
  • better finances
  • attendance biggest concern - tiny cons

  • Jessy - Mountain Desert
  • 2 out of 3 social justice cons - done by clusters
  • youth-adult relations improved until last con - adults only ones who knew what was going on
  • need ideas for making business meetings more effective
    Sarah - QuOM
  • madlib
    Derek - Pacific Southwest
  • excellent year
  • 5 cons in California
  • election Con went well
  • younger youth, good transition
  • need more social justice and spirituality
  • District Assembly not welcoming to youth
    Casey - St. Lawrence
  • Looks good from the outside
  • Good relations with district board, have a youth on the board
  • BUT not really doing anything, not productive
  • need programming
    Katrina - Joseph Priestley
  • 9 cons, 40ish attendees
  • lost a lot of money for youth programs
    Kasey - Metro NY
  • Kasey is new SAC
  • 4 social cons, 2 working cons (social action and anti-racism)
  • Lots of newbies (but still no growth)
  • outreach coordinator visits congregations - very effective
  • ICO Intentional Community Outreach at cons
    Maggie - Central Midwest
  • 3 cons 150-250 people
  • 3 Area Youth Councils - try to do things on local levels for action and bonding
  • need to bring back spirituality and community
  • stamp out cliques
    Sam - Northeast
  • didn't attend YC last year
  • 5 cons
  • good social justice cons
  • in 2007 NHVT and NE Districts will begin sharing a Program Consultant/Youth Coordinator
    Nick - Prairie Star
  • not at last 3 YCs
  • district is growing - hired more staff (Program Consultant and Youth/Young Adult Coordinator)
  • low tolerance initiative at cons - safety
  • need to increase communication
  • only one district con - elections, the rest are "district seal of approval" congregationally-hosted cons
    Tsuki - British Columbia Region
  • reinvigorate
  • 1st AR/AO workshop
  • met with PNWD - adults took over
  • some YAC dropped out
  • 4 committed youth keeping it going
    Paul Hunt - Canadian At-Large
  • Explained Canada
    Rose - Western Canada Region
  • large but empty
  • 2 cons - very small
  • no money
  • lack of developing leadership - no critical mass
  • no adult on RRYSC
  • no bylaws
  • junior high con coming up - the future!
    Chris - C*SAC (National SAC for Canada)
  • develop continental website like her Canadian one - needs info about GA
    Braeden - Post High TARR
  • concern - bridging to nowhere
  • need to know about CUUYAN info
  • inconsistency among districts about when you leave
  • GAP is too huge from YRUU into 18-35, need 18-25 support
    Elisabeth - Junior High TARR
  • 1 ½ years ago became active continentally
  • develop resources for newbies so they know what YRUU is and has to offer
  • AR/AO Training
    Overview of the afternoon:
    -Chalice Lighting
    -Opening Circle
    -Identities, Gifts, Challenges and Expectations
    -Mattering and Marginality
    -Break (10 min)
    -Ground Rules
    -Team Development
    -Welcoming Resistance
    -Break (10 min)
    -People Like Us: Social Class in America (Video)
    -Why Do We Caucus?
    1 hour of ID Groups


    Sara Castro shares reading from Rosemary Bray McNatt
    Laura Manning shares reading from Rebecca Parker
    Sing "Enter Rejoice and Come In"
    Pass the pulse exercise - get in tune with each other to anticipate when the pulse will come

    Identities, Gifts, and Challenges:

    Write on index cards the identities you bring into the room - think as broadly as you can about multiplicity of identities you bring into the process. On other side of card write the gifts and capacities you bring to the work.
    Groups of three to share for 6 minutes what came up for you when you were writing stuff on the cards.
    Write on index card what you want to get out of/take home from this workshop. Share with someone next to you.

  • Better understanding of AR/AO
  • Diverse opinions
  • Learn ways to bring it home to community and district
  • Find people and resources in each district to help with AR/AO work
  • Resources about how to introduce AR/AO to people who it's new to
  • Learn as much as possible b/c interested in applying for Groundwork and starting AR group at school
  • Assess progress and status of AR/AO work in YRUU, feel satisfied and comfortable with that work and how it's going
  • Ideas on how to bring this work into adult communities, onto campuses
  • How to approach everyone - doing the work with love as well as a true sense of seriousness (so people aren't hurt, but don't blow it off)
  • Ideas for how to incorporate into RE and programs for younger kids
  • Develop new mindset, open mind
  • How to deal with people who are very resistant to AR work
  • Ability to change racial tension at school
  • Excited about discussion of classism - looking for good techniques to deal with it
  • Broaden ability to see how my actions and lack thereof affect people around me
  • Make it so that it's not only the POC who are doing the work and educating people
  • How to approach people without making them feel bad about things they've done - do it in a way to build relationship rather than bring about guilt

  • Mattering and Marginality:
    Visualization of time when you felt like you mattered and time when you felt marginalized.
    Write down thoughts on worksheet.
    Share thoughts out loud.
    Why do we do this in the UU community?
  • We often marginalize people who haven't done this work as long
  • Mattering/marginality come hand in hand in YRUU, happen in the same situations/settings
  • Being welcoming is important
  • Get caught up in our principles and sometimes don't realize we marginalize folks too
  • Helps us work with each other
  • Helps bring it home personally
  • Understand on emotional level rather than just intellectualizing it all

    Big difference in what people can give to the community depending on how much they
    feel they belong in the group. Growth of UUism, how do we become more diverse - this
    conversation (marginality/mattering) needs to be brought into these discussions. We all
    know what it feels like to matter or be marginalized. We also know what it feels like to
    do it to others.

    Ground Rules:

    For the AR programming.
  • Step up, step back
  • Get out of your comfort zone
  • Talk to each other
  • We're all teachers/learners, gather and grow together
  • Remember that we're all here to support each other in the struggle
  • Allow people their humanity
  • Remember whose shoulders we stand on - owe history and struggle
  • Remember the importance of community - change comes from a collective
  • Be aware of power dynamics
  • Remember that everyone comes from different background
  • Engage in conflict lovingly
  • Don't assume you know everyone
  • Use "I" statements
  • Remember racism isn't just black and white - remember to include all people of color in discussion
  • Stay at the table

  • Stages of Team Development:

    1. Forming - neutral, meeting new people, finding out what's going on, people are dependent on convener of the team to give them a sense of purpose
    E.g. Youth Council this week
    2. Storming - people begin to position themselves in the team in terms of role and power, difficult time in the life of a team, lots of good ideas die on the vine during this period b/c people don't recognize it as a natural part of group process, need to build community in the face of the issues (mattering and marginality happens, team gets divided), address differences to establish new norms
    3. Norming - establish how we're going to be together as a community, have already looked at some of the biggest challenges before you, groups can get stuck in this phase
    4. Performing - strong interdependence on each other, mattering is very important in the life of the team, easy group to work with b/c can take on much more with less energy tied up in conflicts/avoidance
    5. Transforming - team will change depending on level of difficulty its taking on or other changes in the team, transition

    Can bounce between these stages of development - when gain members, lose members, take on new project, etc.

    Seven Levels of Resistance (Chris Hobgood):

    As change becomes more personal, people are often more resistant to making those
    changes.
    1. Maintenance
    2. Reinforcement - deliberate intervention, but goal is to put things back how they were
    3. Adapting - people begin to come to the table, hearts may not really be in it yet
    4. Revisioning - begin to do work in a way that we integrate shared values (diversity, AR/AO, etc.), look at lives and community in a way that embraces all involved
    5. Retooling - if we had the tool, we would have already created an AR/AO community, so we need ongoing training b/c we're not equipped by society to do this work
    6. Restructuring - if use new set of tools we'll run into bump in the structure that won't let us move forward, use of new tools wll show us where structure can't support new vision
    7. Transforming - the result of all these other things, internalization of new vision and reality, one thing to say these and another to put it into practice

    "Welcoming Resistance" by William Chris Hobgood
    "Soul Work" by Marjorie Bowens Wheatley and Nancy Palmer Jones
    "People Like Us" Video

    Caucusing


    UUA and CUC Introductions


    YRUU Visioning

  • Communicate more between districts
  • Be radically inclusive
  • More multiracial
  • More outreach to youth of color
  • More info on when cons are
  • YRUU send out more AR/AO resources to individual congregations
  • More YRUU activists working in their communities
  • More bridges with the community and with surrounding areas
  • Getting back to following basic components of what YRUU is really about, taking each of them seriously, more of a balance (have lost spirituality and social action in some places) - when you come in no one tells you what YRUU is
  • Resources for social justice and leadership development
  • Get back to the function and structure of YRUU - more info on governance and structure
  • Safe community for youth to grow in
  • Include environmental justice and other issues in social justice efforts

    Share purposes of YRUU:
  • Fostering spiritual depth
  • Clarifying both individual and universal religious values as part of our growth process
  • Provide and manifest greater understanding of UUism
  • Encourage the flow of communication between youth and adults
  • Etc.

    Five working groups will be:
    AR/AO and Social Justice
    Governance
    Outreach
    Youth/Adult Relations
    Spirituality


    Count off into six groups. Each group addresses all five areas.

  • AR/AO - range of different trainings (not just beginner), POC-specific AR/AO trainers
  • Variety in social justice - more than just AR/AO
  • Everyone should be really clear about governance structure (all youth and adults)
  • Infiltrate the UUA - get youth in leadership positions that aren't YRUU
  • Prevent youth leader burnout (same youth do jobs over and over again) - reach out in congregations and districts and bring them to events, bring new people
  • Adults need to be trained by youth, youth talk about what they want adults to know, not just trained by other adults who think they know what youth want
  • Bring back spirituality
  • More SDCs
  • Make sure people have awareness of cultural misappropriation - problem with a lot of UU worship and spirituality
  • Working cons!!!
  • Focus on UUism and UU history
  • Position in YO dedicated to youth of color support and programming
  • DRUUMM and Groundwork activity in all districts
  • More support for bridgers
  • Communication between different districts
  • Stronger youth groups
  • Put the R back in YRUU
  • Canadian position on YRUU SC
  • Burn out prevention
  • Adults who have issues with cons should talk to youth and not district boards
  • More inter-district events
  • Districts more interested in AR/AO work
  • More non-AR/AO social action work
  • Different people in leadership
  • More special events variety
  • More adults in leadership
  • More information to newbies - what is YRUU, etc.
  • More info from district boards about what's happening continentally
  • Outreach to POC
  • Friendlier environment at cons, fewer cliques
  • More ID caucusing at district level
  • Better communication throughout the continent
  • Let younger youth be leaders
  • Resources on social justice, spirituality, youth groups, etc.
  • Identity work - find out who you are so you can talk with other people
  • Increase youth-adult relations - youth on boards, young adults more involved in youth work
  • Continuity in districts
  • Don't lose spirituality when you get more involved in governance
  • Build safe and comfortable communities at youth events, code of ethics - people will leave if it's not a safe community
  • Life changing social action
  • Let people know what YRUU is, in congregations
  • We demand fun time! More community building
  • Information about continental events
  • Inform all about activism, especially newbies
  • Create more congregational youth groups
  • Budget info for youth!
  • More youth on UUA Board
  • Create stronger ties with adult community
  • Districts share worship ideas
  • Networking between U.S. and Canadian youth
  • Save the trees!
  • More communication between SC and YCRs during the year
  • More support for bridgers and college-aged people. Particularly those that are not
    in college.
    o Continental Bridger Con - all local people are invited
    o Strengthen campus ministry and young adult groups
    o Build partnerships between congregations and campus/YA groups
    o Promote bridging packets for youth aging into young adulthood
    o Mentoring relationships between bridgers and young adults
  • Youth and young adult collaboration at GA
  • Cool, respectable, AR/AO knowledgeable young adult leaderships
  • Locally-based anti-creeper curricula
    o WaA young adults
    o Former LRYer youth advisor creepers
    o Cosmic Truckers
  • More young adults become youth advisors
  • Really strong city-wide young adult networks - advertising, money/resources
  • Work with DREs on AR/AO, bridger/young adult support, bridging packets (YO push these packets)
  • Let churches know about UU college students so they can reach out
  • Support and promote young adult ministers (don't currently get as much support or credibility)
  • Mentorship relationships between youth and young adults
  • Youth Office:
    o Connect bridgers
    o Encourage youth to join young adult/campus ministry groups, go to Opus/Concentric
  • More youth representation on congregational and district boards
  • Best practices resources - guidelines for congregations on membership age, board representation, etc.
  • Training and education for boards on youth-adult relationships and how to work as teams
  • More programming where adults and youth are doing things together, rather than separate programming all the time
  • Progressive responsibility model - instilling responsibility and empowerment in youth and children from a young age so they can grow into it
  • Explore restorative justice in both youth and adult communities
  • Increase youth endowment for funding
  • Mentorship opportunities and resources for bridgers
  • Adult support for campus ministry - don't assume everyone is in college b/c some stay at home in their congregations
  • Intentional AR/AO training for adults who work with youth
  • Job positions in YO would be staggered two year positions
  • POC Outreach and Support Specialist in the YO, coordinate with DRUUMM YaYA
  • Anti-Racism and Anti-Oppression Specialist in YO, work with Groundwork
  • Handbooks and manuals for YPSs and YMAs
  • Mission statement developed by YRUU and YO that includes who we are serving and our commitment to AR/AO/Youth Empowerment
  • Encourage YO members to create communication between Board, Administration, and YRUU
  • 1-week paid work week to create AR/AO youth-friendly resources


Tuesday

Community Building

Consultation Workshop

Let's duu it/Let's muuv it Orientation

How to Write a Resolution

AR/AO Program

We are framing the future. We CAN change the world.
We must frame the future in right relationship.
Change takes time. Some of us want the changes to have happened yesterday, but it takes time. Need to build a super highway.

1968 - MLK Jr's assassination; UUA Black Empowerment movement; FULLBAC (full support for the Black Affairs Council); BAC trying to get support for moving their work forward; POC joining UU congregations but had to fit right into the "white reality" rather than congregations changing; Black Caucus walked out of GA

1970-1990 - Period of shutdown and silence. Because of pain we had experienced during the Black Empowerment controversy, we couldn't talk about race in our congregations. Guilt, anger, lack of safety. "Urban justice work" was code word for racial justice work during that time.

1980s-1990s - Began to enter discussion about race again.

1997 - GA passed a resolution (after five years of small group discussion) encouraging UU community/congregations to do anti-racist, anti-oppressive and multicultural work. Some people embraced the resolution and others were very resistant.

2006 - Responsive resolution passed at GA saying every congregation in next year should do one AR/AO program and report on it next year at GA. UUA staff created a website of resources. Youth are helping to move the Association along because youth (esp. youth of color) are not experiencing right relation.

2007 - Summit on Youth Ministry. 10 year anniversary of opening the AR/AO conversation in the UUA. Still trying to "sell" it 10 years later.

Trying to live into a framework of what it truly means to be an anti-oppressive community.

How do we lead to transform?

Transformation:
Emotional Intelligence - understanding the relationship between how we feel and how we behave
Structural Intelligence - understanding of relationship between a structure/system and how we behave
Spiritual Intelligence - understanding of self to level of connection (world, community, environment); recognizing relationship between one's core beliefs and their behavior

Have to function in all three of these areas to transform.
Emotional intelligence is often lacking - inability to be in right relationship. Has become OK somehow in our culture.

Social Change and Social Justice:
If we're doing social justice well we won't need AR/AO because that will be the way we live.
Accountability, Justice, Empowerment ---> Social Change

Community:
Right Relationship is our goal
Reconciliation is how we get into right relationship
Accountability is how we stay in right relationship
All three of these work together to form Beloved Community

When accountability is present, we're not questioning accountability/right relationship because we know it's there. It's the establishment of trust.
Accountability is key to social justice, key to community building, and key to transformation.

Accountability diagram exercise.
Center is the center of power:

  • white privilege
  • rich white men
  • heterosexuality
  • upper and middle class
  • money
  • middle-aged people
  • education
  • government officials and system
  • able-bodied people
  • institutions
  • individual greed
  • U.S. citizens
  • business organizations
  • whole wheat bread
  • English speakers
  • speciesism
  • attitude
  • mental ability
  • HMOs
  • laws
  • land and resources
  • charisma
  • attractive people
  • married people
  • wealthy 1% elite
  • military/police power
  • politicians

    Margins:
  • mentally disabled
  • children/young people
  • lower and middle class/underclass/poor
  • queer people
  • uneducated/illiterate, people without formal education
  • older people, senior citizens
  • people on fixed incomes
  • women
  • single parents
  • unemployed
  • People of Color
    o African descent
    o Middle Eastern descent
    o Native American/Indigenous
  • " People for whom English is a second language
  • Religious minorities
  • physically disabled
  • first generation Americans
  • "…race and all its categories have no significance outside of systems of privilege and oppression, and it is these systems that created them." - Allan G. Johnson's interpretation of statement by James Baldwin

    We've all been socialized to be accountable, obedient, etc. to that center of power.
    Learning how to be accountable to the marginalized groups leads us toward transformation. Groups on margins also need to be in right relations with each other.

    What does accountability look like?
    Marriage equality
    Sunday school stories

    What's the difference between apology, forgiveness, and reconciliation?

    Avoidance: Silence and denial is an avoidance of relationship.
    Negative Projection: Buttons easily pushed, preoccupation with the problem, complaining about other person, justifying own actions
    Encounter: Communicating with the person, shift from judging and defending to listening and sharing
    Apology, Forgiveness: Empathizing with the other person
    Personal Resolve: Moving from focus on the issue to focus on learning and growth
    Mutual Resolve: You trust that the other has resolved and moved from focus on the issue to focus on learning and growth
    Right Relations: Hold each other in esteem and are accountable for communication and new behavior

    Peer mediation isn't about reconciling the problems or conflicts that are there.
    If you bring third person in you have to be clear about motives - not about getting them on your side. There as a resource to help you move toward reconciliation.

    Intrapersonal - reconciliation with yourself
    Interperson - reconciliation between individuals
    Intragroup - reconciliation within a group to keep it a strong community
    Intergroup - reconciliation between groups

    Pair up and talk about first experience where you realized race played a factor.

    Racial Identity Development:
    Goal is to establish healthy identity around race.
    POC and white people are socialized into a racial identity.

    POC (developed by William Cross, based on African American ID development)

  • Pre-Encounter - much earlier age than white people
  • Encounter - makes us question the encounter that helps us realize our race
  • Immersion/Emersion - some get stuck here
  • Internalization - be healthy about who you are
  • Internalized Commitment - to work with other groups

    White People (developed by Janet Helms)
  • Pre-Encounter
  • Encounter - some don't have it until college, something shakes our reality
  • Reintegration - reconnect with white community in deeper way
    OR
    Pseudo-Independent - moving into a different space, ask questions, enter new
    relationships
  • Immersion/Emersion - some get stuck here; come into community with other white people on the journey, e.g. get involved in A.R.E. (Allies for Racial Equity), sometimes get angry at other white people or white authority figure ("why don't they get it!" "why don't they change!"), but can't get stuck in this anger b/c prevents us from reaching right relationship
  • Internalization (not in Helms' model)
  • Autonomy - feel secured and anchored, own how I am shaped by racism, claim new identity and way of being in the world

    Part of this is developing positive relationship and regard for other groups as we develop a healthy sense of ourselves.
    E.g. DRUUMM - come together across racial groups to work collectively
    During immersion/emersion there's often anger - e.g. POC don't like white folks.
    Coming to terms with center of power accountability and how it's impacted self.

    Organizations also go through racial identity development
    e.g. UUA - went into encounter in late 60s, but then went into silence/reintegration, adopted identity around colorblindness
    Small parts of YRUU are in immersion/emersion, but others are in much earlier stage

    Internalized oppression and superiority are part of all these stages.

    Racial identity is not static. It's a process of enactment where people are either:
  • bonding - e.g. Why are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria; within racial groups
    o monocultural/ethnocentric/nationalist - only bond with own group
    o bicultural - interracial families
    o multicultural - open and find value with people of all cultures and races
  • bridging - more work to be in relationship with people who are different
  • buffering - feel need to distance or protect ourselves from someone

  • Evaluation of today's AR/AO session:

    Positive
    ID groups
    AR/AO work - a great first experience
    Very inclusive when talking about different groups
    New activities!
    Feels like almost everything is inclusive to Canadians
    Like UU perspective on the work, makes it more real
    Gradually moved into AR/AO work, way things are being presented is helpful, flow
    Concrete, not just theory
    Heart examples
    Pace - have time to write things down

    Delta
    Pay attention to time/schedule
    More time needed for ID groups

    More info about how to bring this back to district
    Extreme separation is hard to feel included
    Need more moving around and energy breaks
    Role plays, more interactive parts
    Different ways of sharing our ideas and thoughts
    Not all learning styles are being addressed

    Paul does process check report
    -Energy is low
    -Things move a little quickly, preventing shyer people from participating

    When doing searches for ministers for a congregation, the congregation needs to identify where in the stages they are. Immersion ministers have trouble when come into preencounter congregations, and pre-encounter ministers have trouble when come into immersion congregations. Search committees, boards, nominating committees need to get trained in an analysis of this.

    Question for leaders: Have you been through the UUA's anti-racism work? Are you willing to go through? (If not willing, turned down from leadership position. YRUUers can help shape some of the processes that get people in leadership positions.

    ID Groups

    Consensus and Business Etiquette Workshop

     


    Wednesday

    AR/AO Program
    Bill speaks about "journey toward wholeness." Brokenness in our faith community which is brought by racism. Each of us carries this brokenness in our own hearts. Contradictions between our country's supposed commitment to liberty/justice and how we actually behave in the world. Journey toward wholeness is way of seeking healing, finding reconciliation, working for justice, creating right relationship in our communities, congregations, and in our world. We're called into this journey by a 1997 UUA GA resolution "Toward an Anti-Racist UUA." This is a sacred document that defines an identity for our community and calls us into new ways of being. It calls all of us into this journey and into this work.

    Responsive reading of the resolution.

    Call to struggle with diversity in the UUA. Formed five year plan. 1995 Charlotte GA - had whole day devoted to AR/AO programs.

    Critical questions came up in discussion leading up to the resolution (1992-1997):

  • Personal racism - white people in conversation often try to convince POC that they're not prejudiced. White folks just want to talk about their own feelings. Need to open conversation to look at institutional and cultural racism.
  • We all have to be in relationship to create a new way of being in the world together. Put aside assumption that POC have to fit into the white world or white denomination.
  • Listen to one another at a deeper level. White folks listen to authentic stories of POC - marginalization and oppression in society, ways they feel and experience this in our faith community. White folks listen more deeply.
  • Power and Privilege - these issues hadn't been on the table. Liberal-thinking white people weren't addressing ways we could change things. White people need to deal with power/privilege in more open, direct, effective way.

    Crucial word in the document is "anti-racist." This word was not in the 1992 GA resolution.

    Began building relationship with Crossroads Ministry - focused on bringing analysis that comes from lived experience of POC in the United States. POC working in collaboration
    with white anti-racists to come up with ways to talk effectively about race and racism. Also in relationship with People's Institute for Survival and Beyond. If white folks can't put themselves in position of learning from experience of POC, they can't be effective allies.

    Levels of Racism:
    Personal
    Institutional: Preventing us from change and progress. Take organizing skills into the institutions to change and transform them.
    Cultural: Culture is the way we live life. We get pushback because AR work interferes with way we do life in the congregation - incorporate members, worship, RE, etc.

    Power Dynamics of Racism:
    Power One: The power to oppress, control, and destroy People of Color
    Power Two: The power to provide power, privilege, and benefits to White People
    Power Three: The power to shape identity. The internalization of white superiority. The internalization of oppression.
    Each operates at the personal, institutional and cultural levels.
    When POC institutions try to exist, there's a deliberate effort to try to undermine any power or effectiveness. (7 Levels of Resistance - reinforcement aimed at intervening to put things together how they were)
    Discussion of military recruitment
    -POC recruitment has to do with scholarships and money
    -White recruitment has to do with experience and serving country
    Discussion of U.S./Canadian differences with racism

    Cultural Racism:

    Cultural misappropriation is a key example -
    E.g. Energy break we used to use in YRUU - South African song/chant - used in plenary without explaining the words or where it came from or why we as UUs are doing it.
    *Didn't know or acknowledge where it came from
    *Lack of significance and connection to what we were doing at GA, intentionality?
    *Not up to white people to decide whether it's appropriate, up to POC to yield
    *Don't know who we're asking for permission from
    *Even if you know a bit about origins, it's still not part of our history
    *Not culturally appropriate
    *Comparing something spiritual and culturally held to the beaver song when used as an energy break
    E.g. White people have dreadlocks
    *Usually dominant cultures taking from marginalized cultures - pick and choose pieces of culture
    *Treat the world as a spiritual smorgasbord is not appropriate

    Honor what is someone else's and let it be theirs. What white people can do is talk with other white people who want to get locks, share with them about how it's inappropriate, etc. One way to be an ally. Don't ignore it, because that's equal to complying with it.

    Clarifying significance of hair to POC. White folks will talk more about this during ID groups. Illustrates how we're all culturally impacted.

    "Our pain is the breaking of the shell to our understanding." -Kahlil Gibran
    White folks - it's easy when we're asleep. It's when we start waking up that we see
    things differently all around us, and it's difficult.

    When we're uncomfortable we're probably on the edge of learning something new.

    Video: "Race: the Power of an Illusion"


  • Friday

    AR/AO Program
    Many processes we use are not designed for inclusion, but for efficiency. Look at the room we're sitting in - lots of tables and microphones. This is the way people in the white power structure do business. We didn't have this same "box" setup at the Walker Center. It was more fluid there. If we are successful at changing the white powersystem, the business of the UUA will not be structured this way. An invitation!

    How do we take the work back home?
    1. What are the stories, examples, and models of what's going on in congregations and districts that we can learn from? What are learnings from those that can be helpful for everyone?
    2. Resources from Groundwork trainers
    3. Resources from UUA
    4. On the ground tools - how to bring the conversation home

    "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell
    If you can get a certain number of people on board you'll reach the tipping point. Then "changes happen in one dramatic moment." Want a message that is sticky and contagious - people are connectors embodying the message. Think about seven levels of
    readiness (rather than seven levels of resistance).

  • Maintaining, Reinforcing, Adapting, Revisioning, Retooling, Restructuring, Transforming
  • Small groups to talk about, in your part of the world, what signs are you seeing of movement? What's evidence of something being built, signs that the one dramatic tipping point moment might happen?

    Julian Sharp reports about UUA BOT.

  • Who is on the BOT
  • Consultation on Ministry To and With Youth
  • Committee on Committees
  • List of UUA committees
  • BOT AR/AO/MC Assessment and Monitoring Team
  • BOT-SC Meeting at GA 2006 - building right relationship
    o All trustees build relationships with YC members
    o Write reports for each other's meeting pre-packets
    o Meet and greet at GA with BOT and Youth Caucus
    o Youth are invited to observe any UUA BOT meeting
  • Common analysis of AR/AO/MC on the BOT has reached a new level, no longer as compartmentalized
  • Feels taken seriously and respected by other trustees
  • I LOVE to serve!
  • Pictures of Rev. Bill Sinkford
  • Theological education
    o Youth ministry
    o AR/AO
    o 20-30% of UU ministers are educated at Starr King or Meadville Lombard
    o Theological schools are in financial trouble, may not be able to survive
    much longer
    o No consolidation of the schools
  • New UUA Healthcare Plan
  • Gini Courter - UUA Moderator - AMAZINGGGG!
  • Responsive Resolution at GA 2006
    o Video of plenary - technical difficulties
    o Letter to congregational leaders from Paul Rickter
    o We should all make sure this resolution is implemented in our congregations - each do a program on racism or classism over the next year.
  • The BOT is there to support you!

  • Resolutions!!!!!

    Clarify the consensus process.
    Questions about the process.
    Tony facilitates. Kat takes stack.

    YRUU Proposal from the UU-United Nations Office
    (The UU United Nations Office serves as a gateway for UU's to learn about, participate in, and take action on major UN issues such as human rights, peace, equity, and environmental sustainability. We are the official representative of the UUA to the UN.)

    Reid Robinson presents the proposal.

    Proposal: One UU-UNO Envoy (envoy 1: a diplomat having less authority than an ambassador 2: someone sent on a mission to represent the interests of someone else) on every district YAC/DYSC. Will bring info about UU-UNO to the district youth, will attend the UU-UNO Spring Seminar.

    Time is given to read over the resolution.

    Clarifying questions: (Eric, Reid, Sam, Sara Elizabeth, Chris, Helia, Eric, Charlie, and Margaret)
    The following questions were brought up:

    How will it be paid for (travel and registration)? Registration (Housing, programming, food minus two meals) can be paid for in a few different ways. The envoy can pay for the registration on their own, some envoys can be sponsored by their district, region or congregation, and others can get a scholarship from the UUUNO.There isn't any set policy on how the envoys are paid for.

    Can a YAC or DYSC vote in an envoy that isn't in their district or region? No, the person picked should be part of the district so they can bring the information gained at the meeting back to their district or region.

    Is the meeting always in New York City?
    Yes, because that is where the UN is.

    Is there a process for how the YAC or DYSC will pick their envoy?
    That is up to the DYSC or YAC, also upto the DYSC or YAC is whether the envoy will be avoting member on their YAC or DYSC, will be a representative that merely reports back to the district. Even the position itself cannot be mandatory it is up to the YAC or DYSC if they want to participate in this.

    What are the dates for the meeting? April 11-14

    What do you mean by the deadline in short term goals? Contacting all YCRs and district staff to get YAC/DYSC to decide who the envoy would be. Deadline for deciding is September 29, 2006. So office can start informing them of the Spring Seminar.

    What about YRUU subsidy for the position? That was a secondary goal/hope.

    What would the time commitment be to fulfill the position? The time commitments would be to go on the website to get updated, compile information to send to district youth about what's happening at the UN and act as correspondent to the office.

    Are there any specific qualifications for person filling this role? It can be someone who wasn't as involved in district before, but preferably connected. It's important that the person picked has an interest in international issues or would like to.

    Can you explain how the UU-UNO works? How does it tie into the UN?
    UUUNO is an NGO of the UN. Also belongs to UN Association of the United States of America. UU-UNO also represents part of Canada. Go to panel briefings. Very active within the church center at the UN. Just organized a week-long banner hanging outside the building. UN takes action NOW, rather than going through bureaucracy. They are activists of UU principles and values.

    Could this position be combined with the SAC position? Whatever the YAC/district feels is best. If SAC wants to take it on, then yeah!

    Can you explain the pre-existing envoy program? There's a pre-existing envoy program - usually adults - from congregations. This program would be working on what the office has already built to expand it and allow youth envoys.

    Are there any specific positions in envoy program for Youth of Color or GLBPTQQI youth? No.

    Group Discussion:
    1. Many districts will have trouble sponsoring an envoy to go to the Spring Seminar.
    2. That would limit who could go - this is a class issue.
    3. A new YAC position might not work because districts might not respond to our
    recommendation (past resolution for new YAC position wasn't as successful as
    hoped to be).
    4. The envoy could be someone who's already involved in the YAC/DYSC.
    5. Even if not a new YAC position, still creates a class issue.
    6. Lack of District/region language, not inclusive of Canadian folks.
    7. Travel Equalization would be helpful.

    Switch to Jova taking stack.

    List Concerns:
    It's unrealistic to expect all reps can go to the Spring Seminar, for money reasons.
    Where money is coming from, if Youth Council is sponsoring registration.
    There's no process for election of positions and whether they'd be on YAC is 'up in the air'.
    Costs for travel. I respect the organization and their effort to reach out to youth. GA is a lot more costly and people still attend that.
    If no process for deciding envoy, adults might decide and that could be really disempowering.
    Name of position is not inclusive of Canadians.
    Timeframe for implementation - my district doesn't have gathering of youth until half-way through November this year. Couldn't meet the deadline. Would ruin democratic process to meet the deadline.

    Group Concerns:

    Cost to districts
    Where YC sponsorship money is coming from
    Name not inclusive of Canada
    No process for election of positions
    Timeframe/deadline too early for some YACs

    Could group together first two - about expenses.
    But these two are different - from different sources.

    Resolve Concerns:
    Travel Equalization/Cost

  • Reid: Could change long-term goals. Purpose wasn't to attend Spring Seminar. More about getting word out, rather than going to NYC. Don't have to send a representative - not required.
  • Helia: Even if it's not required, that'll mean only people who have money to go can go. Perhaps implement travel equalization, so it'll be more accessible to youth.
  • Sean: Point of info - we can't require YACs to have any position. So this would be a strong recommendation to districts, but not requiring them.
  • Sarah - Person in this position can do a lot even if they can't go to Spring Seminar. Can still be a liaison/communicator. Districts could consider adding this to SAC position.
  • Paul: Suggest Reid remove all references to Spring Seminar from the resolution. Could go if they want, but won't be required in any way.
  • Reid: Can get rid of encouraging statements. But would like to keep responsibility of informing district about the UU-UNO and Spring Seminar so district events don't conflict.
  • Charlie: If YAC can send the envoy, they should. Just make it clear that it's strongly encouraged, but don't remove it from the resolution.
  • Hand shakes - move on from this concern.

    Money from Youth Council
  • Sam: That money could be used for AR/AO trainings. Think we should take that idea out of the resolution.
  • YES! Remove that language.

    No Process for Voting/Election of Position
  • Charlie: We can't make districts elect the same way. Can be chosen however they do it. Let it sit as is.
  • YES! Leave as is.

    Name Excludes Canadians
  • Tsuki: Put region in the title and throughout the resolution whenever district is mentioned.
  • YES!

    Timeframe doesn't allow for elections in some districts
  • Amelia: Timetable can be shifted.
  • Sarah: This would be ongoing. Probably isn't necessary for it to be all decided at exactly the same time. Could change each year to accommodate different needs of districts/regions.
  • Reid: Amend to say when district/region chooses to elect. But UN Sunday is in late October.
  • Sam: For upcoming year, send info out to YACs and DYSCs without worrying about position. Get the word out and make sure they implement the following year.

    Lyn wants to stand aside: We are layering more and more things on that won't actually take place.

    How many districts have AR/AO Consultant based on last year's resolution? - None

    YES! This resolution passes.

    Process Observation from Paul


    Let Bylaws Be Bylaws
    a.k.a. Taskforce on YRUU Bylaws and Policy and Procedures

    Clarifying Questions:
    What spots in the bylaws need to be looked at? About five and a half pages are out of date, we need to look at all of it. The task force will decide what's necessary.
    When would we vote on task force members? Today.
    Is this talking about district bylaws or just continental bylaws? Just the YRUU continental bylaws.
    Does the representative selected by POCC mean they'd be a POC? Or just anyone
    they feel is adequate?
    It was written like that so if no one from that group wants to do it they can select someone else to represent them.
    Kat point of information: POCC was created by white people, so there would be more POC at Youth Council. Not enough POC in YCR positions. Positions are tokenizing and haven't any bylaws. Don't think it's the job of YC to create bylaws for POCC and POCAC - they need to do that within their own community.

    Group Discussion:
  • Tsuki: POCC and POCAC bylaws are not for white male members of YC to decide.
  • Sarah: What can be involved, and what can we make decisions about?
  • Helia: Not OK with only one POCC member on the TF.
  • Braeden: We're working in a white-created system of bylaws, etc. We need to respect that our POC friends have an opinion on this issue, and I support them in that.

    List Concerns:
    Tsuki/Braeden: Concern with last sentence about inserting POCC/POCAC bylaws and guidelines.
    Paul P. point of information: Don't think there will realistically be time to elect positions for this TF today.
    Helia: Issue with article 2 section 1 part D - need more than one Canadian representative. Also needs to be more than one POCC representative.
    Sarah: Schedule is fast paced and hectic. Starts immediately.

    Group Concerns:
    Number 3 in long term goals
    Last sentence in specific problems
    Need more POCC and Canadian reps
    Too fast-paced timeline

    First two can be grouped together - about putting POCC/PoCAC in bylaws. YES
    Group concerns about # of representatives. NO

    Resolving Concerns:
    Inclusion of POCC and POCAC in bylaws:
  • Helia: Both of these should be taken out of the resolution.
  • YES

    Need more POCC reps on TF:
  • Helia: Change number of representatives to at least 2 if not 3. This is a white run organization so realistically those other reps probably won't be POC.
  • Paul: Concern about the size of TF if add more positions to it. Could change section C to 2 POCC positions.
  • Are there concerns with having 2 POCC reps?
  • Helia: I really think there should be 3 POCC reps.
  • Are there any concerns with having 3 POCC reps? NO

    Need more Canadian reps on the TF:
  • Chris: Appreciate this suggestion. Personally don't think it's a problem to have only 1 Canadian rep.
  • Tsuki: Let's not change it.
  • Helia: Cool with me!
  • Let's leave it at one Canadian rep. YES

    Timeline
  • Charlie: Propose putting this off one year, so we can elect members of TF next year. Won't kill us if we put it off one more year.
  • Lizzie: It's important to keep the bylaws up to date but it's also important to have time, so maybe an application process and the SC can over see it.
  • Lizzie: The process says it will take two years to finalize the by laws, so three years if we wait.
  • Charlie: SC is really busy as it is, and to have them select people through an application process, and less people will apply versus run
  • Lizzie: Recognizing that this years youth council, has had scheduling issues, what's to say it won't happen again?
  • Mary; The board of trustees, Lyn has just said to me that it will be in her report that we don't have bylaws that are functioning. We have to figure out something else, because my concerns, operating without bylaws that are functional, we could lose control of the bylaws.
  • Julian: Point of information, the board knows that YRUU Bylaws, know that the bylaws are wicked outdated
  • Elisabeth: Elections weren't in the schedule for this YC ahead of time. But next year they could be.
  • Is everyone OK with postponing TF elections until next YC? Canadians elect rep at CanUUdle? YES
  • Sam: Can we add to the resolution something about hour being set aside at next year's YC to do these elections.
  • Carolina: Make space, but don't determine when in the schedule.
  • Sarah: Let's just change the dates by one year (to 2007).
  • YES concern has been resolved

    Call for consensus on this resolution with proposed amendments - YES
    Lizzie stands aside - really important for YRUU to have up to date policies and bylaws.

    Making the adults in Allies for Racial Equity more accountable to youth within ARE
    Julian and Amelia lead group in lighting of the chalice
    New Facilitators: Jova Vargas and Beth Dana

    Notes continue at 6:25PM, interrupted, so first part of consensus not included in notes


    Amendments to the Resolution:
    There has been a proposal to run it by SC and get it to ARE by August 14th

    Concerns:
    Charlie: concern that it would be difficult to run it past people (get it on listservs, etc.)
    Mary: doesn't want to wait until the end of the month for the letter to come out
    Sean: amendment August 21st would be the latest that SC would return the letter (they would receive it by August 14th), so that it gets to ARE a week later

    Final call for consensus: Title, amendments on the letter, deadline, passing it by SC
    Concerns resolved in 11 ½ minutes

    Formation of a Youth and Young Adult Caucus with in ARE

    Clarifying questions: none

    Discussion:
    Carolina: really supports this
    Julian: don't have to be two separate letters, can be one entire letter with this resolution and the previous resolution, "Making the adults in Allies for Racial Equity more accountable to youth within ARE"
    Charlie: we won't come across as strong, if it is all grouped as one

    Concerns:

    --running the letter by YRUU SC (resolved: by running it by SC)
    --running a letter with the last resolution, will not be as strong/effective/problem with timeline:
    --have it as two separate letters?
    --having it as one letter better, two letters would seem exceedingly demanding.
    --If we write it properly, it will be effective.
    --Chris has committed to writing it.
    --two letters might be redundant
    --include an apology about the amount of letters
    --what would be the timeline if it was a separate letter (by the end of August)
    --we can recommend but not charge them

    Sean: My proposal is that we apologize to ARE that we are sending two letters, and that we didn't have time to get it all out in the first letter.

    Jova: Are there any concerns

    Chris: I'll do what ever the group wants me to do.

    Jova: Folks are not okay about waiting until the end of August.

    Elisabeth: It's the job of the people writing the letters to say if they are okay with the deadlines.

    Jova: Okay, so I'm going to ask, if Youth Council, will trust Charlie and Chris will write the letters.

    It goes to consensus.

    Smorgosbord for a Just Society
    Open discussion has passed, we are currently at clarifying questions (interrupted, so Chris is answering a question).

    Chris: YSJT is supposed to be a training for SACs, it seems that, that is the purpose of the training. I'm just not sure now, that they are trained to carry on and facilitate conferences. Is it a goal of changing how they are trained. I think that it was to make it more affective. Currently it's a training for all folks who do Social justice, and the purpose to reclarify
    the purpose of YSJT.

    1.) There is talk about a newsletter, what would the job of the SACS be about that?
    The CSACs position would be to coordinate putting out that newsletter, and give info on what is going on in each district or region, and other stuff.

    2.) If you are going to do a newsletter, will it be email or something with paper, and if that is the case, how many people will it be sent to, and who is going to pay for that?

    3.) What would the purpose of changing the name of the conference?
    It's an outreach issue, new comers, if new people who come, don't know what it is. If it had a name that was a word, than it would be more accessible for new comers

    Jova: That would be the second time that the name would change in the last few years.

    4.) Why would would the committee be modeled after Groundworks? This would be the equivalent of ground work but focusing on social justice in general.

    Large group discussion
    Lizzie: As you being CSAC and wanting to re-write a job description is hot.
    Helia: As a SAC for my district this sounds like an amazing thing and very beneficial, and from a position of someone who would directly be affected.
    Paul P: Doesn't cost a lot of money and time, why not go for it.
    Carolina: I think that's a great idea.
    Lyn: Will someone have to follow what you write as a resolution?
    Chris: The budget, the short term goals, may need to look at the social justice training collective is to research funding. And if they find it's not doable than it wouldn't be done. As for the job description change, it says strives to so if I can't do it, than it's okay. Almost 100% of this came from the social justice visioning group.
    Helia: I think that it would be okay to change the job description, if this changes the job description, it might give them some more guidance.

    Listing concerns:

    Nick: I just noticed, the second bullet point, says even Christians, re-word that or remove it. Under the 'Hope to achieve' section.
    Sara: My concern the title of YSJT just got changed, and it'd be confusing to do it again.
    Helia: My concern with the small committee and the core committee, there needs to be structure to the elections of that committee
    Braeden: That the core committee is said to be modeled after ground work, but they are a youth and young adult group, but is this just for youth???

    Grouping Concerns:

    Wording
    Even Christians
    Name Change
    Structure to the elections of the committee
    Modeled after Groundwork
    Beth: Which ones can we group (the concerns)

    Then, people try really hard to group wording and the 'even christians' part, but end up working through them separately.

    Even Christians
    1) Derek: The even part, we should knock it out
    2) Elandria: We put that in there, because of the issues with UUs and Christians, and how UUs are down with jewish folks, Buddhists, etc, but the moment someone
    says god, it's all… resistant.
    3) Carolina: I'm in that position, and it came off sarcastic, it just seemed that way, so maybe adjusting the way we say it but acknowledge that that is an issue.
    4) Elwood: I would suggest and putting in including.
    5) Laura: Remove the exclamation point.
    6) Christian thing, agreed upon!

    YSJT Title Change
    1. Helia: YSJT sounds un-inviting and a proposal would be to agree on a
    new name.
    2. Sara: Did you come up with name?
    3. Helia: We didn't come up with a name, so the group could make a name.
    4. Sean: We could just say, Social Justice Training.
    5. Elisabeth: I suggest to keep the name the way it is.
    6. Elandria: This has nothing to do with Ground work, Ground work does ARAO trainings and encourage social justice. Social justice trainings help people do social justice and involve some AR/AO. Acronyms aren't inviting.
    7. Carolina: This should be fixed, and it doesn't have to be an acronym, we can call the the next conference YSJT, but there can be an open space for the people there to pick the future name of the training.
    8. Carolina gets applause, she is awesome.

    Structure
    The Social Action committee and Chris will make a structure.
    Have the group set it up, and then run it by the Steering Committee.

    Beth: Some confusion about who is the small committee. If I'm hearing this, the core committee, the sponsors of this resolution will come up with a vision and structure.

    Okay, excellent, the next concern is about the core committee, being modeled after Ground work.


    Modeling it after Ground Work
    1. I think it'd be more effective as a youth and young adult thing, and that would mean adjusting it by consulting with CUUYAN.
    2. I'd rather it just be youth.
    3. Maybe we could just have it for youth now and consider a collaboration, and leave it open as a possibility.
    4. What I'm saying is that, when people bridge, some young adults are 25 and up,and last year there was 20 year olds, I think it should be youth only and have trainers that are older than 20.

    Wording

    1. Margaret: "social action training (including anti-oppression/anti-racism training)"
    2. Chris: with the word "tolerance" comes from the purposes of YRUU
    3. Beth: empower Chris to incorporate the language and actual action of anti-racism into the proposal.
    4. Eric: stands aside on that "tolerance" change

    Consensus is reached.

    Resolution: Uprooting Cultural Misappropriation

    Clarifying questions:
    Sam: People are going to review RE curriculum? Nan: yes, that is our hope
    Paul H.: New or old staff person? Nan: Could be either.

    Open discussion (5 minutes):

  • Eric: Seems like we are going about this the wrong approach. We as UUs are a denomination based on "omni-denominations." -discussion point held as a concern
  • Carolina: It's reasonable that we don't take other people's practices in our RE program
  • Someone feels that we're not allowing people to address their concerns.
  • Maggie: I think it's a great resolution, and I'm glad people brought it up
  • Laura: as a DRE, I've struggled for a long time about this. I would welcome all the help I could get with this.

    Listing all the concerns:
  • Mary: thrilled that we are doing this, "can we put all countries AND first nations"
  • Has general concerns about this resolution, although we need to know about our own UU heritage, ie. there are Christian UUs who may want to tap into that particular heritage: fuzzy, hard to identify, doesn't want to lose the richness of other cultures
  • Paul: calling for a new staff, if we do it too often, we lose our chances of actually getting it, worried that the task might not actually get done, no mention of LREADA (Liberal Religious Educator's Association-association of DREs) and RE materials.
  • Lyn: Add regions and districts to the language
  • Elwood: would like to add specific word change, concern that "English falls apart in the middle of the resolution"-rewording grammar

    Grouping related concerns
    :
    " 1, 6, and 7 are grouped together
    " Jova: 15 minutes on whole resolution

    Move to Resolving Concerns:
  • Folks rewording 1, 6, 7
  • Jessy: we should pass this to help redefine the gray line
  • Jova: would the people with the concerns, block the passing of this resolution
  • Disagreement with the concern, but will stand aside (if both the things she said were noted)
  • 2 and 3 concerns are resolved
  • Concern over staff member:
  • Writers of resolution to write a letter to the BOT on this
  • Jova: long term goal is to get the YO to do something about this
  • Maggie: we shouldn't focus on "what-if" we make a request on another staff member, we got what we want out there

    It is agreed that this resolution can be added to an existing request

    Lyn: looks like a Lifespan Faith Development position
    Julian: big thing called the Consultation to and with Youth
  • Focus the priorities of the youth movement on the consultation
  • this is about a new vision for our faith
  • never underestimate the power of "framing"
  • we should talk about what in our principles calls us to do this
  • we are a faith community, it's not a PR thing
  • All concerns resolved, added thing for YO staff do to
  • Jova and Ian will take this to the Summit
  • No mention of LREDA
  • Also include the UU Ministers' Association

    India:
  • Are we going to have a way to explain cultural misappropriation in the resources?
  • feel like it's a responsibility of the person creating this
  • All concerns resolved
  • Consensus has been reached
  • 1-standing aside and not blocked (concerns have been noted)

    Resolution: Increasing the Effectiveness of the YCR

    Clarifying questions:
    Chris: Can we change "Strengthens the YRUU community by….."' into "Strengthens the YRUU community"

    Helia: Differences in reports: goal of resolution numbers one and two
  • Answer: by sending them to the districts before the elections occur, the district can do a better job of electing the YCR. First report could be a resource for the YCR could keep and another for the Youth Office

    What did you mean by the "YAC/DYSC co-chairs"?

  • YACs and DYSCS will be key in receiving the reports and distributing them.

    Helia: YCR buddy system: how do you work that one?

  • Lindsay: people could buddy up with more than one person.
  • Laura: pair up new and old YCRs and create a network of folks to connect with after you leave Youth Council, wanted to make sure you have a community of your fellow YCRs to connect back with your districts
  • Paul: pertains to YCRs, at least they have one other person to help, permanent regions paired up, regardless of people switch out of those regions. It is just between YCRs.
  • Chris: maybe at-larges could be paired up with other at-larges?

    Large Group Discussion:
  • This is a good idea, because I was confused and lost, but I still was like, what the hell was this report supposed to look like!
  • The buddy system kicks ass
  • One thing I struggled with, was like 3 weeks before it happened
  • Can make sure that there is a deadline
  • Try and get in contact with the districts
  • The decision was made by BOT at GA
  • Two copies of it being sent out, how is that going to work itself out
  • People aren't fulfilling their whole terms
  • Unless that gets magically fixed, the change over isn't going to be ideal
  • This is supposed to help to address this

    Concerns
  • I'm concerned about the mailing, my YAC doesn't have a chair
  • The mailing is something little, so you aren't so overwhelmed
  • not having contact information
  • if we get these packets and pre-packets
  • my concern is more stuff to read and once there are new YCRs
  • Both mailings would go to the YCR
  • The suggestion was: it could be resolved by point people and implementers.
  • Are there any remaining concerns?

    Consensus!

    An Up to Date Canadian Job Description

    Charlie: If the Canadian's want it, we love them, they should do it and we should support it.

    Consensus!

    A Ratio of Empowerment

    Broad open discussion:
  • Having half adults is weird
  • Concerned that Jova and Ian aren't here and they are our reps
  • As a YRUU rep, I don't think it should be half and half, I think youth ministry affects youth and we should have a large voice in it.
  • There are some adults that are essential to the process.

    Concerns:
  • The ages are overlapping
  • The ratio
  • Money
  • Having younger young adults, meant we didn't need twice as many youth
  • If we were to request 4:1:1, I just don't know how that would be perceived
  • Overlap with youth will allow bridgers to be present (18-20 year olds to be there).
  • The adults that attend are going to be adults that work with young people
  • It seems like there is a desire for more youth

    The Ratio:
  • Chris: My feeling is that the most effective way to do this is to make it a resolution that we want a higher youth ratio and then vote on it, which willhelp it have more weight.
  • The summit isn't as much about input, that is where we are involving everyone, the summit is about making changes and charging the people and bring that home and to make those changes happen.
  • Some of the communities that need the most change is the adults.
  • It is the institutions that need changes.
  • I think the first thing is to remember that it is a principle concern.
  • I don't think they should double the size of the summit.
  • There should be more youth but not a one-to-one ration
  • The ratio used in youth cons is not necessarily apt
  • It is important for all the youth leaders at the table (along with adult leaders)
  • Beth suggests: hopes to achieve/empower Ian and Jova to talk with the task force about increasing the number of youth and encouraging the adequate representation of the folks within the 18-25 age range
  • no concerns regarding this suggestion

    Julian gives a brief statement on the Taskforce
  • Julian is asking that this body authorize the SC to be in relationship with the taskforce and key organizations that are not engaged in this process as much as we would like.
  • Authorizing the SC to write letters to organizations like the UUMA
  • Ministers in our denomination have a lot of priorities, but Julian is asking that they make the Taskforce one of their biggest priorities
  • we would really like you to become engaged in this process" and really "reach out to your members and get them involved"
  • Elwood: thinks that we would get more results if we asked youth in their congregations to speak with their ministers
  • Julian: suggests authorizing SC a format of a letter how youth can approach their ministers and get district folks to pass these letters out at conferences
  • Framing on why this issue is so important to us, and why the youth's needs are not being met
  • Jova: something that can be given to people at the district gathering

    Large Group Discussion:
    Robert: have YCRs put on the entire chapter meeting

    Jova summarizes:
  • Letter from SC to the UUMA
  • Form letter from congregational youth to give to their ministers with help of Julian, Beth, and Jova and Ian
  • Second letter from youth to UUMA chapters - request to get on their agendas

    Consensus is received

    Resolution: Let's Be Inclusive, Eh?
    Canadians know what they want, let them do it, because they are cool.

    Move to call for consensus

    Resolution passed.

    We are done with resolutions. Thank you. Thank you so much.

    Elections
    1 most preferred. 2 second preferred and so on

    Youth Position on the Nominating Committee to pick the Youth Trustee for the UUA Board of Trustees

    Derek Kravitz
    Becca Brown
    Sam Corey

    Steering Committee Elections

    Process: Present people for each position (one at a time), have audience ask questions, have candidates leave room, discuss candidates as needed, then vote.

    YRUU Steering Committee
    5 Youth At Large
    -at least one person identifying with each of the following age ranges:
    14-16
    16-18
    18-20
    1 Adult at large


    The Newly Elected Steering Committee for 2006-2007

    Braeden Lentz 18-20 age range
    Tsuki Naka 16 -18 age range
    Carolina Holt 18-20 age range
    Elisabeth Moore 14-16 age range
    Nick Allen 14-16 age range
    Eric Neal 14-16 age range
    Mary Roffers adult at large (not a youth)

    Youth Position on the Nominating Committee to pick the Youth Trustee for the UUA Board of Trustees

    On a conference call
    Reviewing applications
    Some time this fall it will be taking place!